← Enterprise consulting

Digital Evidence Infrastructure as a Service · EUDI evidence consulting

Court-ready digital evidence infrastructure

Not just signed documents — verifiable proof.

We build tamper-proof, independently verifiable document systems aligned with eIDAS and audit-facing standards — engineered as trust infrastructure, not a boxed feature.

Core offer: EUDI Court-Ready Evidence System — manifest-led packages, verifier APIs, revocation evidence posture, procurement narrative scaffolding (always paired with counsel + QTSP for QES tiers).

Book audit See demo Book consultation
“We make documents legally defensible” means reproducible artefacts — never a shortcut around jurisdiction-specific counsel.

Your documents are not evidence.

Files inside your tenancy are assertions — evidence is something third parties can re-verify without trusting your stack.

PDFs can be modified where storage, IAM, or insider risk fail before anyone opens a verifier.
Signatures without replay are not independently verifiable — reviewers need artefacts + chain context.
Audit trail missing when logs never leave vendor consoles — procurement cannot warehouse proof.
Courts · tenders · boards pressure-test reproducible chains of trust — not slide decks asserting compliance.

We build a full evidence system

Not a SKU bolt-on — metering + quotas layer onto Cloudflare Workers and Stripe economics post SoW.

How it works

Document → Sign → Hash → Timestamp → Audit → Package → Verify

What you get

Evidence ZIP packagePortable dossier auditors and counterparties can inspect without SaaS shells.
Manifest + chainlockStructural chain summaries & binding metadata.
Verify APIMachine + human verifier entry points.
Audit logs exportsOperational chronology hardened for retention policy.
Compliance documentationMappings to eIDAS-aligned principles + procurement language cadence.

Use cases

Cross-border contracts
Procurement & tenders
Legal disputes
Regulated industries

Pricing at a glance

Risk-mitigation budget — not PDF commodity

ScopeInvestment band
Evidence audit (Phase 1)€3K – €8K
Full implementation (typical phases 2–3)€15K – €50K
Subscription run-rate€199 – €2,500+/mo

Phase table below itemises scopes; bands overlap by design until SoW is fixed.

Open phased breakdown Book audit

Why this clears procurement

Enterprise phase model

Commercial packages

Sold the way infra buyers already procure — phased statements of work, then attach recurring verify economics.

Phase 1 · Evidence audit

Diligence sprint

Paper + systems review, eIDAS / tender gap framing, adjudication readiness risks.

€3,000 – €8,000

Deliverable: roadmap + executive PDF dossier.

Phase 2 · Architecture design

Blueprints buyers can circulate

Evidence pipeline CAD, APIs, QTSP pairing, retention, compliance lattice.

€5,000 – €15,000

Deliverable: architecture pack + API contracts + DPIA-aligned touchpoints.

Phase 3 · Implementation

Worker + integrations

Signing flows, Worker APIs, verification, evidence exporter, Stripe metering.

€10,000 – €40,000+

SoW-priced by tenancy depth + ERP touches.

Phase 4 · Trust layer premium

OCSP · TSA · notarisation

Embedded revocation evidence, independent timestamps, optional anchoring/export upgrades.

€5,000 – €20,000

Detached from core build — purchased when auditors demand it.

Phase 5 · Subscription (run-rate)

Operational DEIaaS

PlanMonthly (from)Rough envelope
Starter€199Verify quota · pooled evidence bundles
Pro€490Higher metering · named support window
Enterprise€990 – €2,500+Dedicated SLA + procurement cadence

Figures illustrative until Stripe price IDs + usage pilots land — sized per tenant volume.

Upsell continuum

Audit → Architecture → Implementation → Subscription → Add-ons
Blockchain anchoring
€2K–€10K wedge when anchor discipline is mandated.
Bulk evidence generation
Usage-metered egress after core platform live.
Explainability overlays
€99–€299/mo counselling-grade narrative scaffolding (not bespoke legal advice).
Procurement-ready export kits
€2K+ board / tender dossier formatting.
Why CFOs tolerate it:
this sits in risk-mitigation and capital-protection budgets — seldom compared to martech line items.

Category · trust anchors

DocuSign-class and Adobe Acrobat-class ecosystems solve workflow envelopes — paired with Stripe-class identity rails for payment truth — yet rarely ship verifier-centric dossiers that survive outside vendor UX loops.

Same buyer category · different substrate:
architecture aimed at reproducible proof under EU eIDAS-aligned trust principles.

We sit beneath signature & identity vendors as the evidence layer procurement can archive — re-verify, and hand to auditors without re-opening your SaaS tenancy. That is the DEIaaS wedge: verifiable evidence, not envelope UX.
Reference trademarks belong to respective owners — used descriptively, not implying partnership.

Risk capital calls

“We don't bolt trust on at the footer.
We engineer reproducible proof.”

“Court-ready” describes engineering objectives and packaging for dispute-oriented diligence — never a blanket guarantee of procedural outcome, tribunal acceptance, or QES-tier qualification absent counsel + QTSP alignment. Binding posture is negotiated in Statements of Work.